home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
election
/
52elect
/
52elect.010
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-21
|
39KB
|
761 lines
<text id=93HT1017>
<title>
52 Election: Democrats:To the Future
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1952 Election
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
August 4, 1952
DEMOCRATS
To the Future
</hdr>
<body>
<p> Six months ago it looked as if Harry S. Truman and Robert A.
Taft would be the nominees for the presidency. Instead of these
familiar quantities, the country now has to reckon with two men
relatively new to national politics, both clearly able, both
clearly capable to springing lots of surprises. The two meetings
at the stockyards proved that fresh winds are badly needed.
</p>
<p> Different as the two conventions were, they had one striking
feature in common: intense conservatism. The Democrats' eyes were
turned back to 1932. A more popular character even than F.D.R. in
Democratic Convention oratory was the sheriff foreclosing the old
mortgage. The party mascot no longer seemed to be the donkey, but
the $.02-a-lb. hog. The almost unanimous party line was contained
in the phrase "20 years ago." The Democrats' hope is to stimulate
the fear that the Republicans would (in the words of the official
campaign song) "take it away." At times it seemed as if the
Democrats had nothing to cheer but fear itself.
</p>
<p> The Good Old Days. Conservatism, which has been defined as
the worship of dead revolutionists, was present in the factors
that led the Democrats to pick Stevenson. He was selected in
spite of rather than because of the fact that he is a new face
with a new line of talk. What the real leaders of the Democratic
Party wanted was a man who could repair the North-South damage
and the mink-coat damage of the Truman regime and thereby put the
party back where it was when Franklin Roosevelt died.
</p>
<p> If the Democrats worshiped a dead revolution, a good many
Republicans, at their convention two weeks before, seemed to
worship a dead counter-revolution. Too much Republican oratory
hankered for a "return to" something--return to the good old
days of fiscal stability, low taxes, cheap steak.
</p>
<p> If the conventions are considered as a debate between the
parties, the Democrats came out ahead. Backward-looking though
their line was, it was coherent, consistent and easy for the
voter to understand. But the Republicans were not really arguing
with the Democrats; the Republicans were arguing with each other.
In the deeply earnest conflict over political principle that
raged at the Republican Convention, it was expedient for both
sides to sound as conservative as possible, and, as a result, the
party as a whole sounded far more conservative than it is.
</p>
<p> The Better New Days. What was strangely missing from both
conventions was a sense of the modern American Revolution, that
marriage of political freedom and technology which promises to
Americans and to all men the ever-growing hope of better things
to come. The Democrats are hypnotized into complacency by the
advances over "20 years ago." This dangerous smugness shows in
their foreign (as well as their domestic) policy. "Containment"
is what a diplomat says when he means "Don't let them take it
away."
</p>
<p> Despite the great material prosperity, Americans are not
feeling smug. Their grousing may spring from something deeper
than the price of steak (or mink). They may sense that the future
depends on how the U.S. plays its part in the world crisis and
that this, in turn, depends on what goes on inside the U.S. A
better American life--and not merely what the Democrats mean by
better--could resolve the international deadlock.
</p>
<p> The Democratic leaders are blind to that kind of
opportunity. They shot their bolt "20 years ago" and have no
dynamic approach to the future. If the Republicans get lost in
the "20 years ago" debate, they will not grasp the opportunity
either. Me-neitherism, not me-tooism, is the Republican pitfall.
</p>
<p>The Big Battle
</p>
<p> Before the convention opened, it was clear that Adlai
Stevenson, the reluctant candidate, was the man most of the most
influential delegates wanted. The Kefauver and Harriman forces of
more or less liberal Democrats formed an alliance, decided that
what they needed was an issue comparable to the contested
delegate fight at the opening of the G.O.P. convention. The issue
they hoped would rouse the convention to their side: Northern New
Dealism v. Southern conservatism.
</p>
<p> Monday. At the first night session they rammed through (by
voice vote) a resolution requiring all delegations to sign a
"loyalty pledge," promising to use "all honorable means" to get
the convention's nominees on the ballots in their states. This
was designed to make it impossible for the Dixiecrats to run
their own regional candidate on the Democratic ticket, as some
Southern states had done in 1948. Chiefly responsible for the
loyalty pledge move were Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr., Harriman
campaign manager, Michigan Senator Blair Moody, Michigan Governor
Mennen ("Soapy") Williams, a group which North Carolina's old
(82), formidable former Governor Cameron Morrison called "half-
educated boys." Against them were such fierce old eagles as South
Carolina's Jimmy Byrnes and Virginia's Senator Harry Byrd, who
were politicians before Roosevelt & Co. could spell "caucus."
</p>
<p> Tuesday. The "half-educated boys" began to suspect that they
had gone too far, agreed to soften the pledge by adding a proviso
that, "for this convention only," it would not be binding if it
interfered with state laws. But Virginia, South Carolina and
Louisiana still refused to sign.
</p>
<p> Wednesday. On the floor, it became apparent that there was
no seam in the North-South fight. Reason: the issue that divided
them was "white supremacy," and "white supremacy" is no longer a
live slogan in the U.S. One of the Democratic convention's most
important achievements was to make this fact clear. Few delegates
really wanted to force the South into a walkout. Said Virginia's
Harry Byrd: "We'll just sit here, and maybe they'll have to
throw us out."
</p>
<p> Thursday. On nominating day the delegates, not unlike a
family taking the kids to the circus, eager and just a little
apprehensive, brought a full arsenal of convention democracy--placards and pennants, paper hats and noisemakers, confetti and
enthusiasm, Dick Russell was first. Then that great tribal dance
known as the demonstration for the candidate broke loose, with
waving banners, music shouting. Nominating speeches for Kefauver,
Kerr, Fulbright, Harriman, Ewing followed. More shouting, more
music, more posters. Then Stevenson.
</p>
<p> In the midst of the nomination hoopla, the North-South
battle erupted again. Louisiana's Governor Kennon insisted that
his delegation could not sign the loyalty pledge. "So, I suppose
I shall have to say goodbye and God bless you." Maryland's
senatorial candidate Lansdale Sasscer moved to seat Virginia
even though it had not signed the pledge. The Harriman-Kefauver
forces fought it all out. For a while, it looked as if they would
win this test, Stevenson's own Illinois voted 45 against seating
Virginia 15 for. But by the time the roll passed Pennsylvania, it
became clear that the Kefauver-Harriman bloc did not include the
bosses. Pennsylvania voted 57-13 for seating Virginia. That was
the tip-off to other states that a vote for the motion was a vote
for Stevenson. Pro-Stevenson leaders frantically worked up & down
the aisles, urging delegates to switch. After a wave of
corrections and switches (including Illinois), the vote was 615
for seating Virginia, 529 against.
</p>
<p> The Harriman-Kefauver forces, beaten again, decided they
needed an adjournment to rally their strength and prevent a
ballot that night. Senator Paul Douglas, like a man possessed,
shouted, "Mr. Chairman! Mr. Chairman!" In a hoarse, weird croak,
he moved adjournment. When it looked as if Chairman Rayburn might
let the convention dispose of the matter by voice vote, Douglas,
his face contorted in frenzy, shouted, "Roll call! Roll call!"
The roll was called, and the convention decided to stay in
session.
</p>
<p> While Governor Byrnes was being harassed with questions on
the loyalty pledge, smoke and flames rose from among the tightly
packed crowd of delegates. In short order, the firemen put out
the flames, Jimmy Byrnes rose to say dryly; "I want to announce
that I did not set the place on fire."
</p>
<p> The convention laughed. His remark did much to ease the
tension of the fight. By voice vote the convention seated South
Carolina and Virginia. At 1:55 a.m. after 14 1/4 hours, the
delegates scrambled for their cars and buses.
</p>
<p> The Kefauver-Harriman strategists called a caucus at the
Congress Hotel: F.D.R. Jr. seemed dazed. "Let's see," he rambled...We were dealed out and gaveled out of victory...Life
is not always a bowl of cherries but...I promise you this:
I'll be back..."
</p>
<p> Friday. There were no more noisemakers, no more streamers.
The musicians left their seats. It was the day of reckoning and
the arithmetic was to be more dramatic than the speeches.
</p>
<p> Kefauver spurted ahead at the start. There were no major
surprises. The favorite-son states stuck to their candidates. The
Southern states held a solid front for Richard Russell. Result of
the first ballot: Kefauver 340, Stevenson 273. Russell 268,
Harriman 123 1/2, Kerr 65, Barkley 48 1/2.
</p>
<p> On the second ballot, some favorite son strength melted
away, but there were no major breaks. Both Kefauver and Stevenson
gained. The position at the end of Ballot No. 2: Kefauver 362 1/2.
Stevenson 324 1/2. Russell 294. Harriman 121, Barkley 78 1/2.
</p>
<p> Estes Kefauver sat in his grubby bedroom in the Stock Yard
Inn, a bottle of beer in his hand and a sandwich on his lap. His
sleepy eyes were fixed on the TV screen. As he watched the first
two ballots, his spirits revived. "I've never been more delighted
in my life," said he.
</p>
<p> Then James Roosevelt, Governor Menen ("Soapy") Williams and
Senator Blair Moody appeared in the little bedroom to tell
Kefauver the facts of life.
</p>
<p> He had done better then they expected, but he could never
hope to get enough Stevenson or Russell votes for a majority.
Truman, who was having dinner on the floor below, had just seen
Paul Fitzpatrick of New York and Governor Dever of Massachusetts.
Within minutes, Dever would announce his own witchcraft.
Fitzpatrick the withdrawal of New York's Harriman. It was all
over.
</p>
<p> Kefauver tried one more fantastic grandstand play. With
Senator Douglas, he slipped out of the inn and headed for the
arena, flanked by bodyguards and reporters. They ran into a
police cordon, thrown around the amphitheater because of Harry
Truman's impending visit, pounded on a closed door. No one would
let them in. Then someone led them back to the inn, through a
pantry and the crowded taproom, into the hall.
</p>
<p> The third ballot had reached Colorado. Up the center aisle,
elbowing aside the ushers, came a small procession. The delegates
strained to see who it was. They could hardly believe their eyes:
it was Kefauver and Douglas, heading straight for the platform.
</p>
<p> Later Kefauver explained: he wanted to withdraw in favor of
Douglas, and then Douglas would withdraw in favor of Stevenson.
But Sam Rayburn led the invaders to the back, behind a chain
shutting off the front end of the platform. Cried Rayburn: "Never
in the history of a Democratic Convention has a roll call been
interrupted for any purpose."
</p>
<p> Kefauver and Douglas sat down sheepishly as the roll call
went on. Kefauver's hard core still stuck to him, and individual
delegates still shouted slogans ("I am happy to cast my vote for
that man of destiny from the mountains of Tennessee").
</p>
<p> Sagging Balloon. Michigan's 40 votes were the first big
switch to Stevenson, followed inexorably by a gain of 83 1/2 from
New York. The roll call dragged on, as delegate after delegate
asked that delegations by polled. Theoretically, this is done
when anyone questions the accuracy of the vote announced by the
chairman. Actually, most of those who said they questioned the
accuracy were fibbing; they did it partly for the record, partly
for a brief moment in the TV glare.
</p>
<p> At the end of the roll call, Stevenson was still 2 1/2 short
of the majority. Kefauver finally got the floor. "I, and I know
all my friends, will join to...elect Governor Stevenson as
President of the United States," he said, in a low voice. Utah's
switch put Stevenson over the top. The final vote: Stevenson 617
1/2, Kefauver 275 1/2, Russell 261, Barkley 67 1/2.
</p>
<p> At the rear of the platform stood Nancy Kefauver, an orchid
on her shoulder, tears in the corners of her eyes. An official
asked her to come forward. "No, I don't want to," she said.
</p>
<p> Later, someone remembered that it was Kefauver's 49th
birthday, and the convention dutifully burst into
</p>
<qt>
<l>...Happy birthday, dear Estes,</l>
<l>Happy birthday to you!</l>
</qt>
<p>Hail & Farewell
</p>
<p> Within a space of days, old (74) Alben Barkley was swept
into such riptides of excitement, wild hopes and shattering
delusion as few men ever know in a lifetime. On the very eve of
the convention he heard heart-lifting news: the Administration,
fearful that Stevenson could not be drafted, uncertain of other
candidates, was turning at the eleventh hour to him.
</p>
<p> He hurried to Chicago, buoyed by a strong old man's fierce
pride, strutted five blocks through heat and applause, and girded
himself to grasp the ultimate prize. Then, with cruel suddenness,
the prize was snatched away. The Stevenson boom had never really
died; when Barkley invited some labor friends, among them the
C.I.O.'s Walter Reuther and Jack Kroll, to a friendly breakfast,
they carelessly told him the awful truth: he was too old.
</p>
<p> Forgiveness. No man knew better than he that there was no
appeal from the cold dictates of expediency, but the knowledge
was salt in his wounds. He issued a bitter public reply and
locked himself in his room. The party had not meant to hurt him,
but having done so, it could not rest without obtaining his
forgiveness. He must, it urged, come forth and be saluted. In a
sense it was a terrible request; the party now had nothing to
offer but mocking sound, but it asked that he return thanks and
praise before the world. He agreed.
</p>
<p> On the night the ritual was to be enacted, the
amphitheater's galleries were jammed to the rafters with crowds
which sat ghostly and half revealed behind the slanted, dazzling
shafts of brightness from the television lights. When Barkley
came down the stairs at the end of the platform, stiffened his
back, lifted his chin and advanced unsmilingly to the speaker's
stand, the restless rumble of the crowd became a roar. The
ovation went on for 20 minutes.
</p>
<p> Occasionally, Barkley forced a grin. Occasionally, he lifted
his thick arms for the beelike clusters of photographers below
him. But for the most part he remained motionless and impassive,
his hands clamped on the stand. Behind him in the mezzanine his
pretty wife stood, surrounded by applauding women, stared
expressionlessly straight ahead. She licked her lips as if her
mouth were dry. Then, finally, the uproar hushed and Alben
Barkley began to speak--his vigorous, harsh, measured and
practiced voice carrying to the farthest corners of the huge
hall.
</p>
<p> He was interrupted almost at once by applause. He was, he
cried "more firmly convinced in the righteousness of the
Democratic cause than...ever before in my entire life..."
He was not a candidate. But as he went on, it was impossible not
to conclude that he was making a hopeless, last-ditch attempt to
bring about some improbable stampede of delegates, to set off
some improbable rallying of the television audiences. He spoke
without a text. "Not," he said, "from a piece of paper, but from
the heart." Bathed by applause, he fell into that half trance in
which the old-fashioned political orator achieves communion with
his fellow men.
</p>
<p> No Lightning. Too old? Only last November, he recalled, he
had visited U.S. troops upon the "snowclad mountains" of Korea,
had eaten a humble meal from a mess kit in the open. He had
celebrated his last birthday in Korea, but it was not the last
birthday he would enjoy. He spoke as if he did not really believe
he would return "to the shades and shelters or private life..."
</p>
<p> In effect, he repeated the points made by almost every
orator at the convention--but none had said them as
passionately, as dramatically, or with such skill. The Republican
crusade? "We," he cried, "are not beginning a crusade. We are
continuing a crusade...(for) a happier and fuller life for all
mankind in the years that lie before us." He ended by speaking of
"2 1/2 billion human beings bowed down...by war and fear of
war," predicted that "the day shall come when they shall all
rise...and stand erect before Almighty God...as free men
and women. God grant that it may come in your day and mine. Thank
you...and goodbye."
</p>
<p> As he ended, the hall erupted sound. He stood, arms
widespread, beaming finally in what seemed genuine delight. His
wife made her way down to stand and wave beside him. Dignitaries
rushed up to shake his hand--pink-domed Jim Farley, the
Roosevelt brothers, Jimmy and Franklin, James Caesar Petrillo,
scores of Senators, bosses, party leaders. The clamor went on for
a full 50 minutes. But no lightning struck. No change of heart
gripped the milling thousands--then, or later in the convention.
As he left the platform and disappeared into the mezzanine after
his two hours in the limelight, the crowd was singing: "My Old
Kentucky Home...good night."
</p>
<p>Vigil on Astor Street
</p>
<qt>
<l>Farewell, my friends-farewell and hail!</l>
<l>I'm off to seek the Holy Grail.</l>
<l>I cannot tell you why.</l>
<l>Remember, please, when I am gone,</l>
<l>'Twas aspiration led me on.</l>
<l>Tiddleyly, widdlely, tootle-oo.</l>
<l>All I want is to stay with you.</l>
<l>But here I go, Good-bye.</l>
</qt>
<p>-- Clarence Day
</p>
<p> Three days before he was nominated, Adlai Stevenson went to
earth at the William McCormick Blair home on Chicago's most
aristocratic lane, elm-shrouded Astor Street. What happened after
that was enough to make Gold Coast matrons stare as they strolled
by with their neatly clipped poodles and haughty Chihuahuas.
</p>
<p> Shirtsleeved reporters and photographers, gnawing
sandwiches, drinking coffee and sitting on the curb, took up the
vigil outside the red brick Georgian mansion. From time to time,
William McCormick Blair Jr., a Stevenson assistant, came out of
his parents' house to survey the scene uneasily. He decided to
open up the garden between the Blair house and the four-story
brick home of his 93-year-old grandmother, Mrs. Louise de Koven
Bowen. She wouldn't be disturbed; she was up at the family house
near Waukegan. In the garden the Blair butler, Herman, set up a
makeshift bar and plugged in a portable radio for the reporters.
</p>
<p> Serpents in the Elms. But this did not quiet things down on
Astor Street. Reporters need telephones. So half a dozen
telephone company trucks roared up, electricians swarmed up into
the Blair elms, foremen raced up & down the street, cables
streamed out of the trees like boa constrictors, and nine pay-
telephone booths were set up outside the garden wall. A mobile
unit with six more pay phones hummed at the curb.
</p>
<p> The Chicago Transit Authority was asked to set up portable
toilets on Astor Street. The gold Coast was spared this indignity
when the Maryknoll Brothers, across from Blair house, opened
their bathroom to the press on a 24-hour basis.
</p>
<p> The man inside the Blair house was much more interesting to
cover than the usual candidate; it looked as if he could get the
nomination, but he had not agreed to take it. In the garden and
on the street, reporters and neighbors recalled Stevenson's long
indecision. In April he had said: "I could not accept the
nomination for any other office this summer."
</p>
<p> Last week Stevenson had described himself as
"temperamentally, physically and mentally" unfit for the
presidency. When a friend asked him what he would do if the
convention drafted him, he quipped: "Shoot myself, I guess." All
the while, however, he never said he would not accept a draft,
and his friends kept working furiously.
</p>
<p> "I Shall Go." Inside the Blair house, Stevenson alternately
watched television on the first floor, then worked in a second-
floor room while listening to the radio. He was deeply moved by
the demonstration that roared through the convention hall when
his name was placed in nomination. He sent out a statement: "I
had hoped they would not nominate me, but I am deeply affected..."
</p>
<p> As the balloting and the roll calls of states and the
bickering went on, Stevenson and his friends had moments of
depression. A man who decides to bow to a draft wants a good
strong one. The draft he got was only so-so. Two extreme Fair
Dealers, Minnesota's Senator Hubert Humphrey and Michigan's
Governor G. Mennen Williams, telephoned, talked to Stevenson.
By midafternoon of the last day, he was working on his acceptance
speech. One of his friends who had seen part of the
speech marched into the living room and asked how to pronounce
"schizophrenia"--the malady Stevenson would diagnose in the
Republican Party.
</p>
<p> Just after midnight of the third day, the vigil on Astor
Street ended. The convention had spoken, and the nominee strode
before the microphones on grandmother Bowen's veranda. His first
words were for the reporters and photographers. "First let me say
how much I regret the inconvenience that all of you newsmen have
suffered." Then he turned to the subject of the hour: "...I
have never been more conscious of the appalling responsibilities
of the office. I did not seek it. I did not want it. I am
however, persuaded that to shirk it, to evade, to decline would be
to repay honor with dishonor. I shall go now to the convention
hall and accept the nomination of the Democratic Party.
</p>
<p> Then the nominee's caravan moved off to convention hall.
Before long Astor street was quiet again except for the excited
buzzing of the well modulated voices from the mansions along the
street. They would go on for quite a while.
</p>
<p>The Speech
</p>
<p> Harry Truman had just finished speaking when Adlai Stevenson
walked down the steps on to the rostrum. Truman led. It was the
first glimpse most of the delegates and most of the U.S. had of
the man who Democratic orators told them fervently would be the
next President of the United States. When Truman introduced him,
Stevenson stood ramrod stiff behind the President occasionally
rising on tiptoe. Then he began reading his speech. After 4 weeks
of turgid oratory, Truman's included, Stevenson's words struck an
entirely new deeply appealing note. Most delegates had never
heard anything like it.
</p>
<p> Excerpts:
</p>
<p> "None of you...can wholly appreciate what is in my
heart. I can only hope that you may understand my words...
</p>
<p> "I would not seek your nomination for the presidency because
the burdens of that office stagger the imagination. Its potential
for good or evil now, and in the years of our lives, smothers
exultation and converts vanity to prayer.
</p>
<p> "I have asked the merciful Father of us all to let this cup
pass from me. But from such dread responsibility one does not
shrink in fear, in self-interest, or in false humility.
</p>
<p> "So, `If this cup may not pass from me, except I drink it.
Thy will be done'...
</p>
<p> "And now that you have made your decision, I will fight to
win that office with all my heart and soul...
</p>
<p> "But I feel no exultation, no sense of triumph. Our troubles
are all ahead of us. Some will call us appeasers; other will say
that we are the war party. Some will say we are reactionary;
other will say that we stand for socialism...
</p>
<p> "But we will hear nothing that we have not heard before. I
am not too much concerned with partisan denunciation, with
epithets abuse...Nor am I afraid that the precious two-party
system is in danger. Certainly the Republican Party looked
brutally alive here a couple of weeks ago, and I mean both
Republican parties! Nor am I afraid that the Democratic Party is
old and fat and indolent. After 150 years it has been old for a
long time, and it will never be indolent as long as it looks
forward and not back...
</p>
<p> "What does concern me, in common with thinking partisans of
both parties, is not just winning this election, but how it is
won...I hope and pray that we Democrats...can campaign
not as a crusade to exterminate the opposing party, as our
opponents seem to prefer, but as a great opportunity to educate
and elevate a people whose destiny is leadership, not alone of a
rich, prosperous, contented country as in the past, but of a
world in ferment.
</p>
<p> "And, my friends, more important than winning the election
is governing the nation...When the tumult and the shouting
die, when the bands are gone and the lights are dimmed, there is
the stark reality of responsibility in an hour of history of
strife, dissension and materialism at home and ruthless,
inscrutable and hostile power abroad...
</p>
<p> "Let's face it. Let's talk sense to the American people.
Let's tell them the truth, that there are no gains without pains,
that we are now on the eye of great decisions not easy decisions
like resistance when you're attacked, but a long, patient, costly
struggle which alone can assure triumph over the great enemies of
men--war, poverty and tyranny, and the assaults upon human
dignity which are the most grievous consequences of each.
</p>
<p> "Let's tell them that the victory to be won in the 20th
century, this portal to the golden age, mocks the pretensions of
individual acumen and ingenuity. For it is a citadel guarded by
thick walls of ignorance and mistrust which will not fall before
the trumpets' blast or the politicians' imprecations...(They)
must be directly stormed by the hosts of courage, of morality and
of vision, standing shoulder to shoulder, unafraid of ugly truth,
contemptuous, of lies, half truths, circuses and demagoguery.
</p>
<p> "The people are wise--wiser than the Republicans think. And
the Democratic Party is the people's party, not the labor party,
not the farmers' party, not the employers' party--it is the
party of no one because it is the party of everyone.
</p>
<p> "That, I think is our ancient mission. Where we have
deserted it, we have failed. With your help there will be no
desertion now. Better we lose the election than mislead the
people: better we lose than misgovern the people...
</p>
<p> "I ask of you all you have. I will give to you all I have...in the staggering task that you have assigned me, I shall
always try `to do justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly
with my God.'"
</p>
<p>Prize Specimen
</p>
<p> After Stevenson finished his speech, he withdrew for a
little serious politicking. In a low ceilinged room behind the
rostrum, the candidate and the President gathered with Democratic
leaders to pick a Veep. The others present Illinois' ex-Senator
Scott Lucas, House Majority Leader John McCormack, Sam Rayburn,
National Committee, Chairman Frank McKinney, Jack Arvey.
</p>
<p> About 40 "witnesses" paraded through the room to give their
opinions on who should be Veep. The field quickly narrowed down.
Out went Kefauver (unacceptable in the South), Russell
(unacceptable in the North), Barkley (too old). Oklahoma's Mike
Monroney (not well known enough). The final choice: Senator John
Sparkman of Alabama who, though no Dixiecrat, failed to support
Truman in 1948. Later, one of the men present explained:
"Stevenson made his decision with Harry Truman's help."
</p>
<p> A few hours later, at noon, the convention met once more,
nominated Sparkman, labored wearily through one more
demonstration. Said Stevenson: "You have inspected some of the
finest political livestock in the U.S. (But) we've reserved until
this morning the prize human animal for your approbation."
Stevenson was keeping up his record of an aphorism a day. To New
York Publisher Dorothy Schiff, at the height of the convention
tiredness, he had said: "intellectual rigor mortis has set in."
</p>
<p>The Special Interests
</p>
<p> Harry S. Truman last week explained again the secret of his
party's past successes. "You know" said he "the real reason the
Democrats Party gives the American people the kind of government
they want." The platform which his audience had adopted only two
days before suggested that there was more to the President's
statement than met the eye.
</p>
<p> The 1952 Democratic platform does not address itself to the
American people as a whole. Unlike progressives of an earlier
day. Fair Deal Democrats conceive of politics not in terms of
"the people" versus "the special interests," but in terms of the
people as the sum of innumerable "special interests."
</p>
<p> Accordingly, the 1952 platform contains clauses offering
something to:
</p>
<p>-- Farmers, consumers, taxpayers, civil servants, investors,
organized labor, doctors, advocates of socialized medicine,
hunters, fishermen, conservationists, small businessmen, migrant
workers, airline operators, automobile owners, shipowners, miners,
veterans, students, immigrants, the crippled, the blind, the
aged, the sick, the unemployed, and widows & orphans.
</p>
<p>-- East Germans & West Germans (the hope of unity), Poles,
Czechs, Hungarians, Rumanians, Bulgars, Albanians, Lithuanians,
Estonians, Latvians (the hope of liberty), Indians, Pakistanis,
Japanese, Filipinos, Australians, New Zealanders, Israelis
(continued aid), Arabs ("measures for the relief and
reintegration of the Palestine refugees"), Latin Americans,
Puerto Ricans, Alaskans, Hawaiians; Virgin Islanders, American
Indians and residents of Washington, D.C.
</p>
<p> Digging really deep in the barrel, Democratic platform-
makers had also come up with one of the finest special-interest
appeals yet, a "baby-sitting" clause which urged that day care
for children of working mothers "should be provided and
adequately financed."
</p>
<p> The Democrats seem pleased with their platform and
Republicans should be pleased with one aspect of it: the
Democratic platform proves to the hilt the Republican contention
that no aspect of life is outside the Fair Deal's view of the
Federal Government's domain.
</p>
<p>The Women
</p>
<p> The Democrats did not overlook the fact that they had some
wonderfully interesting female exhibits: two lady diplomats, one
lady treasurer, two lady vice-presidential aspirants and one
world-famous lady delegate to the United Nations. Unlike the
Republicans, the Democratic program-makers managed to give the
impression that they were proud of their women leaders. However,
the Democratic women speakers, like the Republican women before
them, tended to take off from the phrase "we women" in discussing
all problems--as if women were either class B or class AA
citizens.
</p>
<p> The two lady diplomats were not howling oratorical
successes. Mrs. Perle Mesta, party-giving U.S. envoy to
Luxembourg, called her speech "Women as Partners." She began by
saying: "This is one of the most exciting moments of my life," a
line which might have been lifted straight from Call Me Madam, a
musical comedy about her. Sample cliches from her address: "It is
a great thing to be an American woman...In America today
women are a tremendous force." Mrs. Mesta wore a chic black dress
and liberal strands of pearls and looked, withal, as though she
had just come in from cooking over a hot stove.
</p>
<p> The Babble. All the ladies were forced to talk into a
dismaying babble from the delegates. Minnesota's handsome, fair
Mrs. Eugenie Anderson, U.S. Ambassador to Denmark, did achieve
one moment of triumph. During a slight lull she cried that the
Democrats had to go on demonstrating that basic policies were
"made by our civilians...and...not...by generals--
in or out of uniform!" The crowd gave her a rousing hand.
</p>
<p> There were few on the floor and undoubtedly few among
televiewers who did not stare with interest at pert, grey-haired,
52-year-old Mrs. Georgia Neese Clark, the Treasurer of the U.S.
The reason: it is one of Mrs. Clark's duties and privileges to
affix her signature to the lower left-hand corner of all paper
money. She hoped, she said, that everyone in the hall had "many
dollar bills with my signature..."
</p>
<p> Hefty, hearty Mrs. India Edwards--vice chairman of the
Democratic National Committee and a woman with an eye on the
vice-presidency--gave the convention a change of pace. She
tramped to the speakers stand splendidly corseted, and garbed
in lacy black. She clasped her hands over her head and mitted
the crowd. Then she cried--of its treatment of the other women
speakers--"you were exceedingly rude!" Amid the startled
applause she fogged in some fast opening lines.
</p>
<p> The Gavel. "I come to you not just as an official of the
Democratic Party. I come as a woman, a wife who wore a Gold Star
in World War I and a mother who wore a Gold Star in World War II..." She abhorred war, she said, but called on her sex to
demand that the U.S. live up to its military responsibilities.
When the crowd grew noisy she seized the gavel and whacked away
with it like a section hand driving a spike. When she was done,
half the delegates came to their feet to cheer. "I would have
appreciated a little silence more," said Mrs. India Edwards
grimly. (She made many a delegate wonder who Mr. Edwards might
be. He is Herbert Phrelkeid Edwards Acting Assistant
Administrator of the Motion Picture Service of the International
Information Administration of the Department of State and Mrs.
Edwards' third husband. Her first, Dan Sharp, died in action in
World War I. She was married again in 1920 to John Mofield a
Chicago broker; they were divorced in 1937.)
</p>
<p> The biggest ovation was reserved for Mrs. Franklin D.
Roosevelt, whose new frizzy hairdo made her look like a genial
golliwogg. She was introduced by Massachusetts' Governor Dever as
the "first lady of the world." Her arrival also set off a
startling display of acrimony from Southern delegations, many of
whom snubbed her pointedly by remaining seated during the 20
minutes of cheering which followed her entrance. Her speech
seemed anticlimactic--an earnest, highschool debating case for
the U.N. Most of the delegates joined in a tremendous outburst of
applause when she was done.
</p>
<p> In 32 years since they got the vote, women had never before
cut such a swath at a national political convention. Besides the
big-name women, there were 525 women delegates and alternates.
</p>
<p>Domestic Issue
</p>
<p> When the Democratic Convention nominated Adlai Stevenson for
President, it gave him another position: he became the most
eligible unmarried man in the U.S. That status will not ease the
nominee's burden from here to November. Almost every time he is
seen in public with a woman, or a feminine acquaintance mentions
his name with what her listeners consider a special inflection,
tongues will wag and columnists' typewriters will clatter.
</p>
<p> Last week, even before he was nominated, at least four women
were being mentioned as prospective Stevenson brides. All four
rumors were wrong. The fact is that Stevenson has no intention of
remarrying.
</p>
<p> "Incompatibility." Adlai Stevenson married Ellen Borden, one
of CHicago's most attractive debutantes, on Dec. 1, 1928. They
have three sons, Adlai III, 21 (recently enlisted in the
Marines): Borden, 20: and John Fell, 16. In 1949, less than a
year after Stevenson became governor of Illinois, his wife sued
for divorce. The unhappy governor told reporters: "Although I
don't believe in divorce, I will not contest it...Due to the
incompatibility of our lives, Mrs. Stevenson feels a separation
is necessary."
</p>
<p> Now, some of Stevenson's friends are concerned about what
his ex-wife might say and do during the presidential campaign. He
does not share this concern; it was not a factor in his
reluctance to run.
</p>
<p> Last month, Mrs. Stevenson announced that she would vote
Republican, no matter whom the Democrats selected. Said she: "I
feel another four years of Democratic Administration would ruin
the country." But last week she penned a carefully worded note:
"Dear Adlai, Congratulations to the Democratic Party for choosing
the finest available Democrat...All good wishes to you
personally." She handed it to a family friend who carried it just
four doors up Chicago's Astor Street from her home to the Blair
house, where the governor had established his waiting
headquarters. After he read the note, a happy Stevenson scribbled
a reply on the envelope and sent it back to her. "That's grand,"
he wrote. "Many thanks."
</p>
<p> A Sensitive Test. As the first divorced presidential nominee
(of a major party) in U.S. history, Stevenson will face an issue
never raised before. Last may, Pollster George Gallup took a
reading on the question. Results: 81% of those interviewed said
they would vote for a qualified candidate for President even if
he were divorced; 16% said they would not. (At the same time,
another Gallup poll showed that 70% said they would vote for a
military man; 25% said they would not.)
</p>
<p> Some support for Mr. Gallup's finding appeared last week in
Chicago among politicians who could be considered highly
sensitive to the divorce issue. At a caucus of the Massachusetts
delegation, predominantly Roman Catholic, one delegate brought up
the divorce question. Another said Stevenson couldn't be blamed
for the divorce, because his wife divorced him. Said the
delegate: "Hell, half of our wives would divorce us if they
could." A roar of laughter swept the caucus room. On the third
ballot, Massachusetts cast 25 of its 36 votes for divorced Adlai
Stevenson.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>